A major retailer has made the shocking decision to remove self-service checkouts in 12,000 of their stores.
In a surprising move that has sparked widespread discussion within the retail industry, one of the US‘s largest retailers has announced the removal of self-service checkout stations from 12,000 of its stores.
This strategic decision marks a significant shift in the company’s approach to customer service and operational efficiency.
It’s reflective of a broader trend that may signal a pushback against automation in stores…
Self-service checkouts have become a common sight in grocery stores, retail giants, and fast-food chains, promising speed and convenience for customers.
However, their adoption has been met with a mix of enthusiasm and controversy, sparking debates over their effectiveness, impact on employment, and overall customer experience.

Introduced as a solution to reduce wait times and operational costs, self-service checkouts allow customers to scan, bag, and pay for their purchases without the assistance of a cashier.Retailers champion these systems for their ability to streamline operations and handle transactions more efficiently, especially during peak shopping hours.
For many shoppers, self-service checkouts are a welcome innovation.
The ability to quickly process purchases without waiting in long lines is a significant advantage, particularly for those with a few items.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the touchless nature of these kiosks added a layer of safety, appealing to health-conscious consumers.
Despite the convenience, self-service checkouts are not without their drawbacks.
One of the primary criticisms is the potential for job loss.
As retailers invest in automation, the need for traditional cashier roles diminishes, raising concerns about the displacement of workers.
Customer frustration is another significant issue, because let’s face it – not everyone finds self-service checkouts intuitive or easy to use.
Technical glitches, barcode scanning errors, and the need for age verification for certain items often require staff intervention, making the whole process take much longer!
From a financial standpoint, while the reduction in labour costs can offer some savings, the initial setup, ongoing technical support, and frequent updates to the software and hardware can be expensive.
Additionally, issues like theft and unscanned items, known as ‘shrink’, pose significant risks.
Some studies suggest that self-checkout lanes can be more susceptible to theft, as the absence of a dedicated cashier can make it easier for shoplifters to go undetected.
@lifeofbecky Making us all wait & feel bad 🙄 #jobkiller #fypシ゚viral ♬ original sound – goldenbiscuit.tx
A Walmart shopper recently sparked a heated debate online by refusing to use the self-checkout to pay for a single packet of gum.
The woman, identified only as Grace in a TikTok video posted by her friend, declined to use the self-service option, labelling it a ‘job killer’.
Grace’s stance against self-checkouts echoes the sentiments of many who are concerned about the impact of automation on jobs.
The debate over self-checkouts is intense on social media.
One user on X (formerly Twitter) expressed frustration, saying, “Bring back grocery store cashiers. I’m not talking about one or two. I’m saying all registers need to be occupied again,” concluding with ‘please and thanks’ and calling self-checkouts ‘bull cr*p’.
Despite the backlash, some customers shared positive experiences with self-checkouts, often encouraged by store employees to use them for small purchases.
A TikTok commenter mentioned, “I did that once for 3 items and the cashier told me to use self-checkout next time.”
In the viral video, customers and cashiers urged Grace to move along and not hold up the line, illustrating the divided opinions on the issue.
And now, a major retailer has reignited the debate, after revealing its plans to ditch self-checkout machines in 12,000 of its stores…

This isn’t the first major retailer to backpedal on self-checkouts.
