WHO Power Grab That Threatens American Sovereignty Rejected by RFK Jr and Marco Rubio

The U.S. Departments of State and Health and Human Services announced Friday that the United States will formally reject a set of amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) adopted by the World Health Assembly in 2024.

The proposed amendments would have significantly expanded the World Health Organization’s authority during public health emergencies.

The departments issued a joint statement asserting that the amendments posed serious risks to U.S. sovereignty and domestic public health decision-making.

Without action, the regulations were set to take effect and become binding on the U.S. on July 19, even though the country is no longer a member of the WHO.

According to the statement, the amended IHR would grant the WHO the authority to impose measures such as global lockdowns, travel restrictions, and other mandates in response to “potential public health risks,” a term critics say is overly broad and undefined.

The departments further warned that the amendments fail to address what they called the WHO’s “susceptibility to political influence and censorship,” pointing specifically to the organization’s actions during the COVID-19 outbreak and its interactions with China.

The statement continued, “They also suggest that countries develop capabilities that jeopardize management and dissemination controls over public health information, potentially stifling valuable scientific debate,” adding that the proposals would “compel countries to adopt digital health documents.”

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. issued a video statement Friday reiterating his opposition to the amendments and warning that their adoption could enable widespread censorship under the guise of public health.

“These amendments open the door to the kind of narrative management, propaganda, and censorship that we saw during the COVID pandemic,” Kennedy said.

“The United States can cooperate internationally without jeopardizing our civil liberties, without undermining our Constitution, and without ceding away America’s treasured sovereignty.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio also criticized the proposals, saying the language used in the IHR amendments was too vague and potentially subject to political abuse.

“The terminology is vague and broad, risking WHO-coordinated international responses that focus on political issues like solidarity, rather than rapid and effective actions,” Rubio said in the joint statement.

 

 

Today, the Department of State, in collaboration with the Department of Health andHuman Services (HHS), transmitted the oicial U.S. rejection of the 2024amendments to the International Heath Regulations (IHR) (2005). This action deliverson our promise to the American people – to fight for Americans in the internationalsystem, protect our national sovereignty, and prevent international bureaucrats fromshaping U.S. domestic policies.In 2024, the World Health Assembly (WHA) adopted amendments to the InternationalHealth Regulations (IHR) that significantly expanded the World Health Organization’s(WHO) authority over international public health responses. Developed withoutadequate public input, these amendments expand the role of the WHO in publichealth emergencies, create additional authorities for the WHO for shaping pandemicdeclarations, and promote WHO’s ability to facilitate “equitable access” of healthcommodities. These amendments have undue influence on our domestic healthresponses from WHO directives. They also fail to adequately address the WHO’ssusceptibility to the political influence and censorship – most notably from China –during outbreaks. These amendments were set to become binding on the UnitedStates regardless of our withdrawal from the WHO.Terminology throughout the 2024 amendments is vague and broad, risking WHO-coordinated international responses that focus on political issues like solidarity,rather than rapid and eective actions. The amendments also suggest that countriesdevelop capabilities that jeopardize management and dissemination controls overpublic health information, potentially stifling valuable scientific debate. Furthermore, these revisions compel countries to adopt digital health documents. Our Agencies have been and will continue to be clear: we will put Americans first inall our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe onAmericans’ speech, privacy, or personal liberties. These amendments riskunwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy. We are proud to have worked jointly to ensure public health policy continues to bedictated by the values and will of the American people, not unelected global actors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *