Yes folks, they really said that.
Really posted it.
Really wrote it.
Absolutely sick and despicable.
But it’s true!
Take a look right here:
Donald Trump might not have been shot after all https://t.co/60KvtkhY1N pic.twitter.com/fObe2Jr3iG
— Newsweek (@Newsweek) July 25, 2024
And in case they delete the Tweet and the article, let’s save a screenshot, ok?
Here’s a small snippet from the article where they attempt to justify their claim:
But on Wednesday, Wray testified before the House Judiciary Committee that it is not yet certain if Trump’s injury was caused by a bullet or shrapnel.
“To the best of your understanding, how close did the assassin’s bullet come to killing President Donald Trump?” California Rep. Kevin Kiley asked Wray.
Wray replied that his understanding was that either a bullet or a piece of shrapnel “is what grazed [Trump’s] ear.”
Later in the hearing, Rep. Jim Jordan, the committee chairman, asked Wray if all eight bullets fired by the gunman had been accounted for.
These people are sick!
JUST IN: Newsweek suggests that Donald Trump was not actually hit by a bullet at his Pennsylvania rally.
Why believe your own eyes when you can listen to the media spoonfeed you lies?
Newsweek is trying to use FBI Director Wray’s testimony to suggest that Trump was not actually… pic.twitter.com/Y4ZTBjDWAV
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 25, 2024
JUST IN: Newsweek suggests that Donald Trump was not actually hit by a bullet at his Pennsylvania rally.
Why believe your own eyes when you can listen to the media spoonfeed you lies?
Newsweek is trying to use FBI Director Wray’s testimony to suggest that Trump was not actually hit by a bullet and instead, may have been hit by ‘shrapnel.’
Wray said during his testimony that he was not completely certain “what grazed [Trump’s] ear” which Newsweek is now using to cast doubt in Americans’ minds.
The graphic below clearly shows the bullet paths perfectly lining up.
