{"id":3246,"date":"2026-08-16T01:16:25","date_gmt":"2026-08-16T01:16:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/?p=3246"},"modified":"2026-08-16T01:16:25","modified_gmt":"2026-08-16T01:16:25","slug":"washington-commanders-new-logo-slammed-as-disappointing-and-inappropriate-by-native-americans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/?p=3246","title":{"rendered":"Washington Commanders\u2019 New Logo Slammed As \u2018Disappointing And Inappropriate\u2019 By Native Americans"},"content":{"rendered":"

Native\u00a0Americans\u00a0have slammed the Washington Commanders\u2019 new logo as \u2018disappointing and inappropriate.\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n

For decades, Washington\u2019s NFL franchise has been at the centre of one of the most contentious debates in American sports: the use of Native American imagery, language, and symbolism in team branding.<\/p>\n

What began as a long-standing tradition eventually became a focal point for criticism, protest, and legal challenges, with Native American groups and activists arguing that the team\u2019s former identity perpetuated harmful stereotypes and racial slurs.<\/p>\n

The franchise, originally founded in 1932, adopted the name \u2018Redskins\u2019 in 1933\u2014a term that many Native Americans have long described as offensive and deeply tied to a history of violence and discrimination.<\/p>\n

Over the years, protests grew louder, with campaigners arguing that such imagery contributed to the dehumanisation and marginalisation of Indigenous communities, per\u00a0NPR.<\/p>\n

One of the most prominent voices in that fight was activist Suzan Harjo, who spent decades challenging the team\u2019s name through both public advocacy and legal action. She and others argued that the use of Native American mascots and imagery reinforced damaging stereotypes and normalised disrespect toward Indigenous cultures.<\/p>\n

\u201cA lot of people now get it,\u201d Harjo said after the name was finally retired, per\u00a0USA Today. \u201cThat it\u2019s not all right to use disparaging terms, derogatory names, slurs, images, behaviors.\u201d<\/p>\n

A long-overdue rebrand after years of pressure<\/h3>\n

The turning point came in 2020, amid a broader national reckoning on race and social justice. Under mounting pressure from sponsors, fans, and advocacy groups, the franchise finally announced it would drop the \u201cRedskins\u201d name.<\/p>\n

For many Native Americans, the decision marked the end of what had been described as a painful chapter.<\/p>\n

Harjo called it \u2018a huge step forward,\u2019 reflecting a wider sense of relief among those who had fought for change for generations.<\/p>\n

The team temporarily rebranded as the Washington Football Team before unveiling its permanent name, the Washington Commanders, in 2022.<\/p>\n

The new identity was designed to move away from Native American references entirely, focusing instead on a more neutral, military-inspired theme.<\/p>\n

However, even at the time, critics questioned whether the process had gone far enough. Some Indigenous leaders said they had not been meaningfully consulted during the rebranding, raising concerns about whether the team had truly engaged with the communities most affected by its past branding.<\/p>\n

Lingering tensions and a divided fanbase<\/h3>\n

Despite the name change, tensions around the franchise\u2019s identity never fully disappeared.<\/p>\n

Some fans continued to push for a return to the old branding, while others supported the shift toward a more inclusive identity. Meanwhile, Native American organisations remained vigilant, wary of any attempts to reintroduce elements of the past under a different guise.<\/p>\n

The debate also extended beyond Washington, reflecting a wider conversation across American sports. Hundreds of teams at various levels still use Native American imagery, and the Commanders\u2019 rebrand was seen by many as a test case for how professional franchises might evolve.<\/p>\n

For some, the removal of the old name represented meaningful progress. For others, it was only the beginning of a much larger cultural shift.<\/p>\n

New uniforms spark concern<\/h3>\n

In April 2026, the Commanders unveiled a new set of uniforms, presenting them as a blend of tradition and modern identity.<\/p>\n

The designs drew inspiration from the franchise\u2019s past, incorporating elements reminiscent of its Super Bowl-era look while aiming to project a fresh image for the future. Early reactions to the uniforms themselves were largely positive, with many fans praising the updated aesthetic.<\/p>\n

But attention quickly shifted to one specific feature: a new alternate logo that incorporated a spear intertwined with the team\u2019s \u201cW.\u201d<\/p>\n

The team described the design as symbolic, stating that the spear and letter represented \u201ca powerful joining of past and present.\u201d They added that the spearhead symbolised leadership and strength, framing it as part of a forward-looking identity.<\/p>\n

What may have been intended as a subtle nod to tradition instead reignited a long-standing controversy.<\/p>\n

\"NFL\"
Native Americans have slammed the Washington Commanders\u2019 new logo as \u2018disappointing and inappropriate.\u2019Credit: Adobe Stock<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Native American groups condemn \u2018inappropriate\u2019 imagery<\/h3>\n

The introduction of the spear logo drew immediate criticism from several Native American organisations and advocates, who argued that it represented a step backward.<\/p>\n

The Association on American Indian Affairs issued a strong statement in response.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Washington Commanders\u2019 decision to update their logo is disappointing and inappropriate to say the least,\u201d the organisation said. \u201cIt is time to stop repeating this cycle and listen to Native Peoples who have been clear, consistent, and unwavering on this issue: We are not your mascot.\u201d<\/p>\n

For critics, the issue was not just the symbol itself, but what it represented in a broader historical context.<\/p>\n

Not In Our Honor, a Native American advocacy group, argued that the logo undermined the progress made by the team\u2019s earlier rebrand.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey are backsliding from the correct decision to stop the Native American cultural appropriation,\u201d the group said. \u201cThe spear on their helmet has no place with the new name and brand.\u201d<\/p>\n

Experts warn of deeper impact<\/h3>\n

Scholars and researchers also weighed in on the debate, raising concerns about the potential impact of reintroducing such imagery.<\/p>\n

Stephanie Fryberg, a social psychologist who has studied the effects of Native-themed mascots, warned that symbols like the spear can have real psychological consequences.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe reintroduction of imagery and language tied to the team\u2019s former identity is a step backward,\u201d she said. \u201cResearch has long shown that Native-themed mascots and symbols cause psychological harm, particularly to Native youth.\u201d<\/p>\n

Her comments highlight a key argument made by critics: that even seemingly minor visual elements can reinforce stereotypes and contribute to the erasure of contemporary Native identities.<\/p>\n

Harvard historian Philip Deloria echoed those concerns, questioning the logic behind the design.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s a shame that they decided to make this move,\u201d he said. \u201cThey\u2019d successfully rebranded, so why rebrand again?\u201d<\/p>\n

He also challenged the team\u2019s explanation of the symbol\u2019s meaning.<\/p>\n

\u201cSymbols don\u2019t work that way,\u201d Deloria said. \u201cThey are collectively created, transmitted, and interpreted, not invented by a marketing team.\u201d<\/p>\n

Supporters defend the design<\/h3>\n

Not all responses to the new logo have been negative.<\/p>\n

The Native American Guardians Association (NAGA) expressed support for the inclusion of the spear, describing it as a positive acknowledgment of Native heritage.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s encouraging to have a small piece of Native imagery represented again,\u201d the organisation said, suggesting that the symbol could be seen as a form of recognition rather than appropriation.<\/p>\n

This divide reflects a broader complexity within the debate, where perspectives can differ significantly even within Native communities.<\/p>\n

While some see any use of such imagery as harmful, others view it as an opportunity for representation\u2014highlighting the difficulty of reaching a consensus on issues of cultural symbolism.<\/p>\n

Team stands by controversial design<\/h3>\n

Despite the criticism, the Commanders have indicated that they intend to move forward with the new logo.<\/p>\n

Team president Mark Clouse addressed the decision in a radio interview, acknowledging that not everyone would agree with the change.<\/p>\n

\u201cI know we\u2019re not always going to make everybody happy,\u201d he said. \u201cBut we really do listen. We care.\u201d<\/p>\n

He explained that the spear had already been used in the team\u2019s branding and marketing, and that incorporating it into the uniform felt like a natural progression.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd the spear became just this really interesting icon,\u201d Clouse said, adding that the team plans to continue integrating it into merchandise and future designs.<\/p>\n

The logo is set to appear on alternate uniforms during select games this season, ensuring that it will remain a visible part of the team\u2019s identity moving forward.<\/p>\n

A controversy far from over<\/h3>\n

The reaction to the Commanders\u2019 new logo underscores how sensitive and unresolved the issue of Native American representation in sports remains.<\/p>\n

For many critics, the introduction of the spear is not just a design choice but a symbol of unfinished business\u2014evidence that the franchise has not fully moved on from its controversial past.<\/p>\n

For supporters, it represents a more nuanced approach, one that attempts to balance tradition with modern identity.<\/p>\n

What is clear is that the debate is far from settled.<\/p>\n

Years after the team abandoned one of the most controversial names in sports, the conversation about how it represents itself\u2014and who it listens to\u2014continues to evolve.<\/p>\n

And with the new logo now set to take the field, that conversation is only likely to grow louder.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
View this post on Instagram<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

A post shared by Washington Commanders (@commanders)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Native\u00a0Americans\u00a0have slammed the Washington Commanders\u2019 new logo as \u2018disappointing and inappropriate.\u2019 For decades, Washington\u2019s NFL franchise has been at the centre of one of the most contentious debates in American … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3247,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2],"class_list":["post-3246","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-trending","tag-breaking-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3246","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3246"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3246\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3248,"href":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3246\/revisions\/3248"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejoeroganpod.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}